You indulge in a sexual act, and your partner records it. Mobile phone is not the only way to do it, there are cameras which are as small as a bug.And not only just records it, but also puts it up on the net, and sends it to everyone you know. Or it could have been a third party who does it. Or you and or your partner could have been under the influence of drugs, or you would have agreed to the act, but not to the recording, or you could have agreed to the recording but not to the circulating.
What do you think should be the law in the following options
1.The person who agrees to the circulation irrespective of gender,is below 16 years and thus may not be able to comprehend the effects of the circulation.
And when a person is above 16 years :
When do you think the law of the land should step in, the above 10 cases
If all of the above are ok for guys, will it be also ok, if it is their sister or daughter who would be above 16 years of age. If you are a guy who has consented to the recording and circulation of a sexual act, but for some reason, you become temporarily unable to get an erection, and if the recording is circulated and you are being potrayed as Impotent, would you answer the above questions differently?
Rather than use just as the DPS school incident in the background please keep this too in mind :
Jalgaon is a small but industrially prosperous town on the map of Maharashtra. On 24th June 94, the news flashed. Some hundred girls and married women had fallen prey to some local masterminds. How was it being done? The modus operandi was something like this
3 million brides and grooms. Find your life-partner at BharatMatrimony.com